In 1849, Henry David Thoreau
wrote a paper titled 'Resistance to Civil Goverment'. And, while they
may have spelled the word 'government' differently back in those
days, never have such words had such timely import! Today we
refer to the intent of his essay as the practice of 'civil
Disobedience'.
Thoreau begins his paper with, 'I
heartily accept the motto, "That government is best which
governs least"; and I should like to see it acted up to more
rapidly and systematically. Carried out, it finally amounts to this,
which also I believe—"That government is best which governs
not at all"; and when men are prepared for it, that will be the
kind of government which they will have. Government is at best but an
expedient; but most governments are usually, and all governments are
sometimes, inexpedient. The objections which have been brought
against a standing army, and they are many and weighty, and deserve
to prevail, may also at last be brought against a standing
government. The standing army is only an arm of the standing
government. The government itself, which is only the mode which the
people have chosen to execute their will, is equally liable to be
abused and perverted before the people can act through
it.' [I supplied the bold type]
Those words really struck home, for me.
As a Nation, we are preparing to elect a known crook and congenital
liar to the land's highest office, in my opinion! When Hillary
Rodhammer Clinton takes the pledge of office on or about January the
21st, the words she speaks that day will be meaningless
other than perhaps to represent one of the final nails in the coffin
containing the remains of a once great Republic.
Thoreau then goes on to state that it
is never a government the propels a country to greatness, but rather
the character of the masses, contained therein, that gets the job
done. In his words, 'Yet this government never of itself furthered
any enterprise, but by the alacrity with which it got out of its way.
It does not keep the country free. It does not settle
the West. It does not educate. The character inherent in the
American people has done all that has been accomplished; and it would
have done somewhat more, if the government had not sometimes got in
its way.'
I doubt that old Henry would have
believed the horrific state of this country in 2016. Back in his day,
the 'structure of control on the Delaware' was vastly less complex.
The cancerous tumor, it would it would one day become, only the
smallest mole on the butt of a then healthy Nation. Yet, even back in
the 19th Century, Thoreau wrote, 'All men recognize the
right of revolution; that is, the right to refuse allegiance
to, and to resist, the government, when its tyranny or its
inefficiency are great and unendurable.'
Thoreau, and the people of that time,
fully understood that things could go south in a hurry. Now, 167
years later, they have.
No comments:
Post a Comment